Engelsman Magabane Incorporated

When Leave Turns Litigious: Pregnancy Discrimination, “No-Return” Tactics & How Courts Respond

Engelsman Magabane Incorporated Blog Graphics - pregnancy discrimination South Africa Labour Court

Typical Flashpoints

  1. Unpaid “safety leave” without risk assessment or attempts to accommodate.
  2. Refusal to reinstate or sudden role changes after maternity/parental leave.
  3. Unequal parental leave access post-Van Wyk.
  4. Paper-thin policies and untrained supervisors.

What The Courts Are Saying

  • Brandt v Quoin Rock Wines (2022): Pregnancy is a standalone protected ground. Side-lining or dismissing during maternity can be automatically unfair. Damages and compensation follow.
  • Moleme v Induradec Coatings (2025): Extended unpaid leave imposed on a pregnant employee (instead of accommodation) amounted to unfair discrimination; the Court awarded substantial back pay.
  • Parental leave post-Van Wyk: Employers must not perpetuate unequal caregiving entitlements in policy or practice; interim compliance is already binding.

Employer Playbook (Prevent the Dispute)

  • Write it down: Current leave policy covering annual, sick, family-responsibility, maternity and post-Van Wyk parental-type leave.
  • Risk → accommodate → document: For pregnancy, do a written risk assessment and consider reasonable adjustments before any removal from work.
  • Return-to-work protocol: Plan re-entry dates, role confirmation, and phased returns where needed.
  • Manager training: One hour per quarter on leave and discrimination prevents costly mistakes.
  • Audit UIF & payroll: Ensure claims and top-ups are timely and accurate.

Employee Toolkit (Protect Your Rights)

  • Keep a paper trail: requests, notices, doctor’s letters, HR emails.
  • Ask for the policy and the risk assessment (if pregnant).
  • Escalate early through grievance/HR; consider legal advice where necessary.
  • Know timelines for CCMA/Labour Court referrals.

Conclusion

The direction of travel is clear: equal caregiving and non-discrimination. Employers who modernise policies and document decisions rarely end up in court. Employees who understand their rights resolve problems sooner — and safer.

References

Brandt v Quoin Rock Wines (C152/2021) [2022] ZALCCT 66. SAFLII
Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd (D581/2023) [2025] ZALCD 18. SAFLII
Van Wyk and Others v Minister of Employment and Labour [2025] ZACC 20. SAFLII
Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (consolidated). SAFLII

Scroll to Top